Sony FX3 vs Sony ZV-E10

“People like me that are hybrid shooters and clients require both video and photography in the same shoots. An EVF is essential for photography so the fx3 is useless to me. We already must each carry at least two cameras for different lens options/backups. Imagine if we had to do the same for video, we would need 4 cameras per person. By the a7s existing, that cuts it down to 2. If the fx3 had an EVF, then maybe I would agree with you, but until that happens, I hope the a7s line never goes away and instead they make an a7siv with 24mp so that the photos have more resolution and it can do native 6k.”

“I just made the jump from the ZV-E10 to the A6700 myself and the viewfinder was the main reason. I found it impossible to judge focus and exposure precisely on the display of the ZV-E10 before taking the shot, even with all the assist features. The viewfinder on the A6700 is good, it does everything I need it to do. I'm sure there are better viewfinders on full frame bodies, but that's irrelevant, because Sony doesn't offer them on APS-C. Between the EVF, the improved AF, and the IBIS, I am taking way more shots that are sharp with focus exactly where I want it. I have zero regrets that I went for the A6700. I also have an A6000 that I use with the viltrox chip lens as everyday carry in my jacket pocket. The viewfinder on that is more frustrating. It's just not sharp / high res enough, and it's too small.”