Rockwell 6C vs Rockwell 6S

“I saved what mailman169 wrote on just this sunject. I hope he doesn't mind me sharing: Had a chance to use the .68, and I like it a lot better than the 6c. Here is why: 1. It is a lot thinner than the 6c. This makes it easier to shave under the nose. 2. There is more gap under the blade so that hair doesn't get stuck. With the 6c, I had to sometimes unscrew the plate to get hair out when my hair was a bit longer. Hair rinses right out with the GC. 3. The 6c isn't wide enough to hold the entire blade, so it sticks out slightly on the ends. This can cut just because the blade is so thin. The GC is slightly wider to cover the width of the blade. 4. As for shave quality, the GC felt so smooth (I used a wilkenson blade). I also felt I would never cut myself. I could have probably gone a little more aggressive, but I am okay with what I have. I might get the next level plate to go with it. Overall, I am really happy with the GC and Idk if I will use the 6c anymore.”

“I'd return it to Amazon. Unless things have changed, Rockwell will not honor their lifetime warranty if the razor was purchased through a third party vendor. Also, as an ex-Rockwell 6s user myself, I would like to amplify the advice above about getting a Razorock instead. My Gamechanger is is better than my 6s in every metric that matters, and did it for half of what my 6s cost.”