Gillette Slim Adjustable vs Rockwell 6C

“I know what you mean. Some people are definitely on the make. I’ve seen listings for razors I’ve bought asking for 3x what I paid for mine. I’ve seen the most inflated so far today, though I suspect there have been even more outrageous examples. Try a Slim for the equivalent of $551 not including postage. It’s just a regular 1963 I4 Slim. I paid the equivalent of $40 for mine 14 months ago in similar condition and that included postage!”

“I saved what mailman169 wrote on just this sunject. I hope he doesn't mind me sharing: Had a chance to use the .68, and I like it a lot better than the 6c. Here is why: 1. It is a lot thinner than the 6c. This makes it easier to shave under the nose. 2. There is more gap under the blade so that hair doesn't get stuck. With the 6c, I had to sometimes unscrew the plate to get hair out when my hair was a bit longer. Hair rinses right out with the GC. 3. The 6c isn't wide enough to hold the entire blade, so it sticks out slightly on the ends. This can cut just because the blade is so thin. The GC is slightly wider to cover the width of the blade. 4. As for shave quality, the GC felt so smooth (I used a wilkenson blade). I also felt I would never cut myself. I could have probably gone a little more aggressive, but I am okay with what I have. I might get the next level plate to go with it. Overall, I am really happy with the GC and Idk if I will use the 6c anymore.”